Judgement-rich work
24%
Target direction: grow
↑ 5% vs Apr
demo@northstar.exampleWork Profile
Coordination load is 21% of in-scope time. Three activity groups account for two-thirds of that.
- Coordination load
- 21%
- Process overhead
- 24%
- Top 3 groups
- 67% of load
Core execution
32%
Support with better context
↑ 5% vs Apr
Coordination load
21%
Reduce avoidable loops
↑ 5% vs Apr
Process overhead
15%
Simplify or automate
↑ 5% vs Apr
Avoidable burden
8%
Remove or reduce
↑ 5% vs Apr
Work Profile Map
?Group byDomainDownload
Share of observed time (width) and annualised cost (area) by activity domain and group.
Human judgementCore executionCoordination loadProcess overheadAvoidable burden
Annualised cost (area · height)
Share of observed time (width)
Friction hotspotLower confidence
i
What this shows. Width shows share of observed time. Area shows annualised cost. The map only expands team-level patterns that passed the readout boundary; protected or below-confidence activity remains grouped.
Target mix hypothesis
What the readout suggests changing
Shrink
Renewal evidence reconstruction, Decision follow-up loops
Standardize or automate
Manual control-pack assembly
Keep human led
Client work
Evidence states
Safe reading guide
Observed but not graduated into a stable reportable baseline.
Outside the agreed evidence base.
Protected because the value cannot be shown safely at this level.